[tei-council] explicit att.global?

[Laurent Romary]

This is a necessary move in any case. I have also prayed for less  
magic. And the refinement proposed below has to be supported as well.
Action!

Le 31 janv. 11 à 14:55, Lou Burnard a écrit :

> On 31/01/11 13:51, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
>> On 31 Jan 2011, at 13:22, Lou Burnard wrote:
>>> I'm still uneasy, but give an uneasy assent to the following  
>>> heretical
>>> propositions:
>>>
>>> a. All existing TEI element specs need to be updated  to include an
>>> explicit reference to the class att.global
>>>
>>> b. References throughout the Guidelines to this class and to the
>>> attributes it provides need to be checked and possibly reworded to  
>>> make
>>> clear that the class behaves no differently from any other att class
>> are you simply agreeing, but restating what needs doing; or
>> proposing a variation? it looks like the former, but thought I had
>> better check.
>>
>> there is of course
>>
>>    c. redo ODD processing to stop att.global being added twice
>
>
> not intended to be a variation, but rather a preciser statement of  
> what
> needs doing, which you have made yet preciser.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tei-council mailing list
> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
>
> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

Laurent Romary
INRIA & HUB-IDSL
laurent.romary at inria.fr