[tei-council] explicit att.global?

Lou Burnard lou.burnard at retired.ox.ac.uk
Mon Jan 31 08:55:12 EST 2011

On 31/01/11 13:51, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
> On 31 Jan 2011, at 13:22, Lou Burnard wrote:
>> I'm still uneasy, but give an uneasy assent to the following heretical
>> propositions:
>> a. All existing TEI element specs need to be updated  to include an
>> explicit reference to the class att.global
>> b. References throughout the Guidelines to this class and to the
>> attributes it provides need to be checked and possibly reworded to make
>> clear that the class behaves no differently from any other att class
> are you simply agreeing, but restating what needs doing; or
> proposing a variation? it looks like the former, but thought I had
> better check.
> there is of course
>     c. redo ODD processing to stop att.global being added twice

not intended to be a variation, but rather a preciser statement of what 
needs doing, which you have made yet preciser.

More information about the tei-council mailing list