[tei-council] validation of examples

[Lou Burnard]

Thanks... I seem to have completely missed that discussion. Must have 
been on a train somewhere. Or asleep.

I see this is still an orange ticket though. Is there a majority on 
Council in favour of adding at least @valid right away?




On 30/01/11 12:25, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
> On 30 Jan 2011, at 12:18, Lou Burnard wrote:
>
>> Fair point James...
>>
>> I think we need a proper definition of "feasibly" valid
> no mystery about this. from http://www.thaiopensource.com/relaxng/jing.html
>
> "A document is feasibly valid if it could be transformed into a valid document by inserting any number of attributes and child elements anywhere in the tree. This is equivalent to transforming the schema by wrapping every data, list, element and attribute element in an optional element and then validating against the transformed schema."
>
>> Maybe a sf ticket proposing the addition of the @valid attribute to<egXML>  (if that is indeed what we want to do) would help us concentrate on the problem better
> its all in https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3156049&group_id=106328&atid=644065
> --
> Sebastian Rahtz
> Information and Support Group Manager, Oxford University Computing Services
> 13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431
>
> Sólo le pido a Dios
> que el futuro no me sea indiferente
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tei-council mailing list
> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
>
> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived