[tei-council] Hyphenation discussion

Lou Burnard lou.burnard at oucs.ox.ac.uk
Sun Jan 16 16:24:58 EST 2011

On 16/01/11 17:21, Kevin Hawkins wrote:
> This is excellent.


>    A few notes are madein red below.

Sadly, my email reader doesnt do red.

> I like your plan of action but also would very much like to see the note
> in the definition of lb clarified regarding use of inWord, noBreak, and
> mayBreak.  Could this note also be added to the definitions of<cb/>  and
> <pb/>?

yes, as I said below, I will update the definitions for all these 
elements once we are in agreement with the proposals herein.

>> whether to record it explicitly, by including an appropriate punctuation
>> character in the encoding[Can we be more explicit than "in the encoding"? Perhaps "in the text data"?]


>> breaking. XML mixed-content rules are notoriously confusing on this
>> issue.[The previous sentence feels misplaced, and it's not clear which issue you're discussing (whether the newline character is word-breaking?)]
maybe the term "mixed content" needs glossing.

More information about the tei-council mailing list