[tei-council] invalid examples allowed in Guidelines?

[Laurent Romary]

On the contray (and we had this debate before), our duty is also to  
anticipate and give guidance on mechanisms which are direct  
consequences of providing something as generic as ODD. I would not  
mind mentioning in the documzentation that a feature is not yet  
implemented in Roma, but let users decide what they would do with this.
A concrete application would be for someone to extract (by means of  
his home-made stylesheets) all examples that can be validated and put  
them as a reference set for further distribution. You don't need to  
change your tools for this. Think large!

Le 11 janv. 11 à 10:56, Sebastian Rahtz a écrit :

>
> On 11 Jan 2011, at 09:53, Laurent Romary wrote:
>
>> I would combine this proposal with what I suggested yesterday. We  
>> need
>> to put flesh around egXML in any case. James' proposal impacts on the
>> presentation, but we also need to control the validation
>
> I am personally not in favour of adding features which we cannot  
> implement.
> So I'd suggest not putting in an RFC unless/until we have a clearer  
> idea how
> such a thing could work.
>
> In general I would say that what schema elements are validated  
> against,
> and how that is arranged, is outside our scope.
> --
> Sebastian Rahtz
> Information and Support Group Manager
> Oxford University Computing Services
> 13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431
>
> Sólo le pido a Dios
> que el futuro no me sea indiferente
>

Laurent Romary
INRIA & HUB-IDSL
laurent.romary at inria.fr