[tei-council] invalid examples allowed in Guidelines?

[Sebastian Rahtz]

On 11 Jan 2011, at 09:53, Laurent Romary wrote:

> I would combine this proposal with what I suggested yesterday. We need  
> to put flesh around egXML in any case. James' proposal impacts on the  
> presentation, but we also need to control the validation 

I am personally not in favour of adding features which we cannot implement.
So I'd suggest not putting in an RFC unless/until we have a clearer idea how
such a thing could work.

In general I would say that what schema elements are validated against,
and how that is arranged, is outside our scope.
--
Sebastian Rahtz      
 Information and Support Group Manager
Oxford University Computing Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431

Sólo le pido a Dios
que el futuro no me sea indiferente