[tei-council] invalid examples allowed in Guidelines?
sebastian.rahtz at oucs.ox.ac.uk
Tue Jan 11 04:56:46 EST 2011
On 11 Jan 2011, at 09:53, Laurent Romary wrote:
> I would combine this proposal with what I suggested yesterday. We need
> to put flesh around egXML in any case. James' proposal impacts on the
> presentation, but we also need to control the validation
I am personally not in favour of adding features which we cannot implement.
So I'd suggest not putting in an RFC unless/until we have a clearer idea how
such a thing could work.
In general I would say that what schema elements are validated against,
and how that is arranged, is outside our scope.
Information and Support Group Manager
Oxford University Computing Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431
Sólo le pido a Dios
que el futuro no me sea indiferente
More information about the tei-council