[tei-council] Calling all naming experts

[James Cummings]

I'm currently undecided, but think that this definitely would benefit from more community discussion on TEI-L.

James

Lou Burnard <lou.burnard at retired.ox.ac.uk> wrote:


Actually I could be pesuaded we need both generic and specific elements. The proposal  originated on tei-l  so could be revived there certainly. What do other counsllors think?

Sent from my HTC

----- Reply message -----
From: "Sebastian Rahtz" <sebastian.rahtz at oucs.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Sat, Jan 8, 2011 12:19
Subject: [tei-council] Calling all naming experts
To: "Lou Burnard" <lou.burnard at oucs.ox.ac.uk>
Cc: "TEI Council" <tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU>

On 7 Jan 2011, at 21:13, Lou Burnard wrote:

>>  Or invent a new generic grouper
>> called<block>.
>
> this was suggested earlier, and i see the logic, but i am not sure i see
> the need for it. this particular use case is the only persuasive case
> I've come across so far for non-tesselating subdivisions.

I would suggest we test this a bit more widely
than just the Council.  I am not sure everyone out there
would agree with you, gasp.

my argument is purely theoretical - a <block> would
sit alongside <seg> and <ab> to give us an anonymous
container at all three levels.

we could also, of course, allow <div> to non-tessellate but
I think we should make sure paramedics are ready in
Southmoor Rd to assist quickly at your attack of apoplexy
before I suggest that....
--
Sebastian Rahtz
Information and Support Group Manager, Oxford University Computing Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431

Sólo le pido a Dios
que el futuro no me sea indiferente





_______________________________________________
tei-council mailing list
tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council