[tei-council] TEI Canonical URIs and DOIs

[James Cummings]

Ah good, so I was right to close it. ;-)

-James


David Sewell wrote:
> I believe the conclusion was that it would cost more money than it would
> be worth to register DOIs for all the Guidelines and Web pages.
> 
> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010, James Cummings wrote:
> 
>> I've just closed:
>>
>> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2411994&group_id=106328&atid=644065
>>
>> which was arguing for the TEI adopting a DOI solution to providing canonical
>> URIs.  I believe we now provide canonical URIs for source and guidelines as my
>> last comment on that ticket shows.  However, providing canonical URIs is
>> indeed different than providing DOIs.  I have a recollection that the council
>> discussed this at some point but not what the conclusion was.
>>
>> If additional comments are added to the ticket, obviously, I'll reopen it.
>>
>> Just trying to tidy up,
>> -James
>>
>>
> 


-- 
Dr James Cummings, Research Technologies Service
OUCS, University of Oxford