[tei-council] TEI Canonical URIs and DOIs

David Sewell dsewell at virginia.edu
Tue Sep 14 09:51:21 EDT 2010


I believe the conclusion was that it would cost more money than it would
be worth to register DOIs for all the Guidelines and Web pages.

On Tue, 14 Sep 2010, James Cummings wrote:

> I've just closed:
>
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2411994&group_id=106328&atid=644065
>
> which was arguing for the TEI adopting a DOI solution to providing canonical
> URIs.  I believe we now provide canonical URIs for source and guidelines as my
> last comment on that ticket shows.  However, providing canonical URIs is
> indeed different than providing DOIs.  I have a recollection that the council
> discussed this at some point but not what the conclusion was.
>
> If additional comments are added to the ticket, obviously, I'll reopen it.
>
> Just trying to tidy up,
> -James
>
>

-- 
David Sewell, Editorial and Technical Manager
ROTUNDA, The University of Virginia Press
PO Box 400314, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4314 USA
Email: dsewell at virginia.edu   Tel: +1 434 924 9973
Web: http://rotunda.upress.virginia.edu/


More information about the tei-council mailing list