[tei-council] wait there's (a few) more
James.Cummings at oucs.ox.ac.uk
Tue Sep 14 07:45:03 EDT 2010
Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
>> 3058674 Add model.graphicLike to content of glyph ...
> make <glyph> a member of model.graphicLike? makes me nervous.
> what on earth would it mean in the text body? DISAGREE
Could I point out that <char> and <glyph> both had <graphic>
before and it was erroneously removed before and substituted with
<figure>? I then suggested that we return it to <char> because I
had noticed it was removed from there and we have now already
done so. It was simply me neglecting to notice it had also been
removed from <glyph>. We are not suggesting that <glyph>
becomes a member of model.graphicLike but that <glyph>'s content
allow model.graphicLike. If you disagree with this you really
need to explain why <char> should be allowed to have <graphic>
elements in it but <glyph> should not be allowed to. I think you
are misunderstanding the ticket.
Dr James Cummings, Research Technologies Service
OUCS, University of Oxford
More information about the tei-council