[tei-council] wait there's (a few) more

James Cummings James.Cummings at oucs.ox.ac.uk
Tue Sep 14 07:45:03 EDT 2010

Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
>> 3058674 Add model.graphicLike to content of glyph  ...
> make <glyph> a member of model.graphicLike? makes me nervous.
> what on earth would it mean in the text body? DISAGREE

Could I point out that <char> and <glyph> both had <graphic> 
before and it was erroneously removed before and substituted with 
<figure>?  I then suggested that we return it to <char> because I 
had noticed it was removed from there and we have now already 
done so. It was simply me neglecting to notice it had also been 
removed from <glyph>.   We are not suggesting that <glyph> 
becomes a member of model.graphicLike but that <glyph>'s content 
allow model.graphicLike.  If you disagree with this you really 
need to explain why <char> should be allowed to have <graphic> 
elements in it but <glyph> should not be allowed to.  I think you 
are misunderstanding the ticket.


Dr James Cummings, Research Technologies Service
OUCS, University of Oxford

More information about the tei-council mailing list