[tei-council] Criteria for TEI Repository Inclusion
James Cummings
James.Cummings at oucs.ox.ac.uk
Wed Mar 3 08:52:08 EST 2010
Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
> I don't think there is any one-answer-fits-all solution. People and their
> "software" vary hugely, both in themselves and over time. We
> do know roughly the boundaries, by using our exemplars of
>
> * Tite (close to our hearts)
> * Epidoc (far away, own very capable community)
> * TEIJ (in between)
>
> for the last, I think we start by cultivating it inhouse and then branching
> it off when it grows some legs (i _lurv_ mixed metaphor)
I think that seems quite reasonable as a vague policy myself.
But if EpiDoc was just starting out, would we then include it and
only kick it out when it got mature enough to stand on its own
three feet?
What about something like the genetic editing material? We have
a directory called genetic/ where some of those working on
genetic editing (as a sub-group of the TEI-MS SIG originally)
have some work in progress which will eventually come before the
council. Now in this case it is probably there because various
members of the council/board are involved in this completely
worthwhile endeavour, and it just seemed like a convenient place
to store it. But why isn't there one fr work happening in
scholarly journals, correspondence, or other SIG activities? (It
isn't that I object to the genetic being there, just that it
seems potentially incongruous or confusing to others). If we are
thinking about how/when we include/exclude stuff, where does
general SIG working materials/testfiles/examples fall?
-James
More information about the tei-council
mailing list