[tei-council] Suppressed text: summary of position (FR 2242434)

Gabriel Bodard gabriel.bodard at kcl.ac.uk
Mon Nov 2 10:48:44 EST 2009


For what it's worth, I really don't like the idea of the element name 
being a processing instruction (if nothing else because most editions 
*don't* actually want to completely suppress or expunge said text). I 
want the element name to mean, "This text is in the source text, but the 
editor things it doesn't really belong/was included in error."

I personally can't think of anything better than <superfluous>, and only 
tried to think of something shorter in case anyone objected to such a 
long element name.

(Are there any objections to the element per se, before we get embroiled 
in naming wars?)

G

David Sewell a écrit :
> I don't have a strong case to make pro or con the proposal from the
> point of view of epigraphy or manuscript editing, not being a
> specialist. However, I would vote for the element with the name
> <suppress> (not <suppressed>) because of its utility as a
> quasi-processing instruction for born-digital documents. Suppose I am
> writing minutes for a TEI Board discussion of the TEI Tite bids that
> includes names of vendors. But those names should be kept confidential
> in any Web version of the minutes. So:
> 
>  We agreed that <suppress reason="redact">Vendor X</suppress> is ...
> 
> which could be rendered as
> 
>  We agreed that [redacted] is ...
> 
> Of course there are other ways to accomplish the same thing, and I do
> not feel passionate about this if someone has a good objection.
> 
> David
> 
> On Sat, 31 Oct 2009, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
> 
>> On 30 Oct 2009, at 18:17, Elena Pierazzo wrote:
>>
>>> I know Sebastian said that tomorrow (today) was the last possible
>>> day to
>>> include new stuff for the next release, but I feared we arrived a bit
>>> last-moment, especially because we are actually reopening the games
>>> for
>>> the element name (see the message at the very bottom). If we missed
>>> the
>>> deadline, we apologise...
>>>
>>
>> its ok, if everyone agrees, we can get this in the release.
>> --
>> Sebastian Rahtz
>> Information Manager, Oxford University Computing Services
>> 13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431
>>
>> Sólo le pido a Dios
>> que el futuro no me sea indiferente
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> tei-council mailing list
>> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
>> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
>>
> 

-- 
Dr Gabriel BODARD
(Epigrapher & Digital Classicist)

Centre for Computing in the Humanities
King's College London
26-29 Drury Lane
London WC2B 5RL
Email: gabriel.bodard at kcl.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)20 7848 1388
Fax: +44 (0)20 7848 2980

http://www.digitalclassicist.org/
http://www.currentepigraphy.org/


More information about the tei-council mailing list