[tei-council] Tite and conformance (long)

[Lou Burnard]

O'Donnell, Dan wrote:

> The reason for worrying about this is that we are promulgating Tite and considering as the basis of what will be a very high profile benefit. It is bad policy to promulgate something that has aspects that we strongly deprecate in our guidelines (i.e. The namespace issue).

I'll drink to that. So  do you want to change the whole structure of the 
Guidelines' recommendations on conformance issues, arrived at after not 
a little effort, and  protracted debate? Or how about reconsidering the 
hastily taken decision to "promulgate" something which is clearly broken?