[tei-council] Tite and conformance (long)
Sebastian Rahtz
sebastian.rahtz at oucs.ox.ac.uk
Thu Jul 9 18:18:14 EDT 2009
Lou Burnard wrote:
> Or how about reconsidering the
> hastily taken decision to "promulgate" something which is clearly broken?
the only brokenness is the decision to omit the whole header
module, which happened only in May, and was discussed
here I recall. Before that Tite was entirely pukka,
I promise.
--
Sebastian Rahtz
Information Manager, Oxford University Computing Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431
Sólo le pido a Dios
que el futuro no me sea indiferente
More information about the tei-council
mailing list