[tei-council] Supplying default namespace with TEI Tite

[Sebastian Rahtz]

Lou Burnard wrote:
> Of course if we had an active SIG (or something) saying "we really 
> need specialised forms of <hi> (etc) by analogy with the specialised 
> forms of <seg>" possibly in their own separate module, that would be 
> different!
we have a tei-in-lib sig, who could make the case I suppose
>
> I *really* don't understand  the need for <ornament> as distinct from 
> <graphic>
> though. Has anyone ever explained that?
>
<ornament> has content, unlike <graphic>. wrapping it all in
a <figure> is a bit verbose.

-- 
Sebastian Rahtz      
Information Manager, Oxford University Computing Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431

Sólo le pido a Dios
que el futuro no me sea indiferente