[tei-council] Supplying default namespace with TEI Tite
Daniel Paul O'Donnell
daniel.odonnell at gmail.com
Wed Jul 8 20:29:29 EDT 2009
Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
> Lou Burnard wrote:
>
>> Of course if we had an active SIG (or something) saying "we really
>> need specialised forms of <hi> (etc) by analogy with the specialised
>> forms of <seg>" possibly in their own separate module, that would be
>> different!
>>
> we have a tei-in-lib sig, who could make the case I suppose
>
>> I *really* don't understand the need for <ornament> as distinct from
>> <graphic>
>> though. Has anyone ever explained that?
>>
>>
> <ornament> has content, unlike <graphic>. wrapping it all in
> a <figure> is a bit verbose.
>
>
Also, wasn't that a pre-source forge feature request or similar from the
DLF? I remember Sebastian, Christian, and I working on it in Berlin.
--
Daniel Paul O'Donnell
Associate Professor of English
University of Lethbridge
Chair and CEO, Text Encoding Initiative (http://www.tei-c.org/)
Co-Chair, Digital Initiatives Advisory Board, Medieval Academy of America
President-elect (English), Society for Digital Humanities/Société pour l'étude des médias interactifs (http://sdh-semi.org/)
Founding Director (2003-2009), Digital Medievalist Project (http://www.digitalmedievalist.org/)
Vox: +1 403 329-2377
Fax: +1 403 382-7191 (non-confidental)
Home Page: http://people.uleth.ca/~daniel.odonnell/
More information about the tei-council
mailing list