[tei-council] ESF Proposal

[Arianna Ciula]

Indeed, I did suggest the same to Lou (internationalisation could be more prominently highlighted than it currently is).

One additional remark: the ESF guidelines state that as far as participants from the non-ESF country regard 'their expenses should, in principle, be covered from sources other than the ESF award'.

Best,
Arianna

==
Dr. Arianna Ciula
Science Officer

European Science Foundation 
Humanities Unit
1 quai Lezay Marnésia 
BP 90015
F-67080 Strasbourg
France

Email: aciula at esf.org
Tel: +33 (0) 388767104


> -----Original Message-----
> From: tei-council-bounces at lists.village.Virginia.EDU [mailto:tei-
> council-bounces at lists.village.Virginia.EDU] On Behalf Of David Sewell
> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 5:55 PM
> To: Lou Burnard
> Cc: TEI Council
> Subject: Re: [tei-council] ESF Proposal
> 
> My only comment would be that if possible the topic of
> internationalization should be highlighted and included in the
> abstract,
> as this seems to me one of the features/concerns of the TEI that would
> particularly justify ESF funding.
> 
> David
> 
> On Tue, 28 Apr 2009, Lou Burnard wrote:
> 
> > You'll remember that at our Lyon meeting Laurent and I were actioned
> to
> > go away and draft a proposal for an exploratory workshop for
> submission
> > to the European Science Foundation, on the topic of "whither P6?" or
> > words to that effect.
> >
> > Time and space being what they are, I'm afraid we're perilously close
> to
> > missing the deadline (teatime on Thursday) for this one. But for what
> > it's worth, we do now have a draft and an initial list of proposed
> > invitees, which Council members are urgently requested to peruse and
> > comment on! It's at http://tei.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ESF/esfproposal.xml
> >
> > Note that as well as the deadline, we're constrained by ESF rules
> about
> > who we can invite: they have to be people from institutions located
> in
> > ESF-funded countries. No observers, even self-funded, are permitted.
> > They will graciously permit a "small number" of exceptions for
> > scientifically essential participants, but we've chosen to interpret
> > that small number as "one" (the budget wouldn't realistically permit
> > more than that anyway)
> >
> > Laurent and I think this is a great way of kicking off the debate
> about
> > how the TEI will develop during the next five years, whether or not
> we
> > get the funding (to be fair, the success rate is only around 15% so
> > don't book that time off work yet)
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > tei-council mailing list
> > tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
> > http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
> >
> 
> --
> David Sewell, Editorial and Technical Manager
> ROTUNDA, The University of Virginia Press
> PO Box 801079, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4318 USA
> Courier: 310 Old Ivy Way, Suite 302, Charlottesville VA 22903
> Email: dsewell at virginia.edu   Tel: +1 434 924 9973
> Web: http://rotunda.upress.virginia.edu/
> _______________________________________________
> tei-council mailing list
> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council