[tei-council] Fwd: No pb in listBibl?

Laurent Romary laurent.romary at loria.fr
Tue Oct 28 11:57:57 EDT 2008


Dear all,
I have the intuition that we should do something there. Any strong  
feeling? We need at least a ticket in SF.
Laurent

Début du message réexpédié :

> De : Greg Murray <gpm2a at VIRGINIA.EDU>
> Date : 28 octobre 2008 15:56:21 GMT+01:00
> À : TEI-L at listserv.brown.edu
> Objet : Rép : No pb in listBibl?
> Répondre à : Greg Murray <gpm2a at VIRGINIA.EDU>
>
> Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
>> Greg Murray wrote:
>>> In P5, pb is not allowed as a child of listBibl. More generally,  
>>> the content model for listBibl does not include model.global. This  
>>> appears to be a change from P4, where the content model for  
>>> listBibl includes m.Incl. Is this a feature or bug in P5?
>>>
>> a feature, probably :-}
>> model.global is allowed within <bibl>, so you can
>> always put the <pb> there. Is that not sufficiently
>> expressive?
>
> Well, not really. I am converting P4 documents to P5, and I find  
> that the P4 markup
>
> <bibl>...</bibl>
> <pb/>
> <bibl>...</bibl>
>
> expresses what's in the printed source just fine: the bibliographic  
> entry ends, followed by a page break, followed by another  
> bibliographic entry. I'd prefer to leave the page breaks where they  
> are rather than move them (rather artificially in my view) within  
> one of the bibls. Is there a reason why allowing milestone elements  
> within listBibl would be problematic or ill-advised?
>
> Thanks,
> Greg Murray



More information about the tei-council mailing list