[tei-council] see FR 1925125

[Gabriel Bodard]

Why did we decide to add @precision to att.editLike? Surely we only need 
@precision when the element supports a number attribute (@value, 
@quantity, aut sim.), and in that case the element should be a member of 
att.dimensions anyway, shouldn't it?

In any case, which elements in att.editLike were we specifically 
thinking need @precision?

G

Lou Burnard a écrit :
> Gabriel proposed  the following two changes as resolution for this ticket
> after the last Council:
> 
> ----
> (1) @extent and @unit on gap are to be suppressed, and instead gap will be
> made a member of att.dimensions, which gives it @quantity and @unit.
> 
> (2) att.dimensions is to be extended by the addition of attributes: @from
> and @to (to indicate ranges of quantities); @atLeast and @atMost (for
> uncertain/imprecise quantities).
> ----
> 
> The trouble with this is that we also decided to add @precision to both att.dimensions and att.editLike.
> Adding <gap> (which is a member of att.editLike) to att.dimensions would thus give it the same attribute twice.
> 
> Suggestions?

-- 
Dr Gabriel BODARD
(Epigrapher & Digital Classicist)

Centre for Computing in the Humanities
King's College London
26-29 Drury Lane
London WC2B 5RL
Email: gabriel.bodard at kcl.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)20 7848 1388
Fax: +44 (0)20 7848 2980

http://www.digitalclassicist.org/
http://www.currentepigraphy.org/