[tei-council] attribute lists

[Sebastian Rahtz]

Laurent Romary wrote:
> That's exactly the direction to follow. I am myself very bad at 
> presentation things. But I can already see the usefulness of it.
>
> Would it make sense to have too views in the "used by" (one after the 
> other or toggling), that is:
> - like is now, sorted by elements
> - the other way round, sorted by attributes, with the list of 
> corresponding attributes behind (e.g. @value[eLeaf, eTree, iNode, 
> node, etc.])
>
we don't present two views elsewhere, so possibly will confuse people. But
I see what you mean. If I had to choose, I think I'd prefer your view to 
be the default.

Of course, when we have the alphabetical attribute list, you'll get 
something
similar there.

-- 
Sebastian Rahtz      
Information Manager, Oxford University Computing Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431