[tei-council] Roma sanity checker and customization templates

[Sebastian Rahtz]

David Sewell wrote:
>   Warning: _rendition_ is not reachable from root
>
> which I assume has to do with the fact that @rendition is still in
> att.global in the TEI Lite template, but <tagsDecl> is deleted so that
> there's no place to put a <rendition> element for @rendition to point
> to.
>   
good point
> So this raises a couple of questions about the integration of Sanity
> Checker into Roma:
>
> * Do we need to tweak the custom templates so they don't produce
> Sanity Checker warnings?
>   
yes, probably.
> * If not, where and how should we provide some explanation for end users
> to help them distinguish between serious warnings and informational
> warnings that can be ignored in practice?
>
> With the status quo, a user might think we're supplying a bunch of buggy
> templates. Can we get Ioan or one of his co-developers to supply us with
> a big of explanatory language on the meanings of the diagnostics
> produced by the Sanity Checker?
>   
that means Veronika or me, in practice. Ioan was just
on loan. Its very true, the Sanity Checker is a little
opaque.

-- 
Sebastian Rahtz      

Information Manager, Oxford University Computing Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431