[tei-council] concerns regarding <charDesc>

[Christian Wittern]

Lou Burnard wrote:
> Christian Wittern wrote:
>   
>> Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
>>   
>>     
>>> may be more consistent to name it <charDecl>, in line with <classDecl>?
>>>
>>>
>>>   
>>>     
>>>       
>> Yep. That might solve Lou's problem with naming it <listChar>. So I'll
>> go with this if there is no strong opinion against it.
>>
>>   
>>     
> But you wouldn't like renaming <char> and <glyph> to <charDesc> and
> <glyphDesc>?
>
>
>
>   
Yes, I'd like to keep these two as they are. They are quite handy like
that and I would specifically not like to re-use the now abolished
<charDesc>, since this would cause confusion to current users, me thinks.

Christian

-- 

 Christian Wittern 
 Institute for Research in Humanities, Kyoto University
 47 Higashiogura-cho, Kitashirakawa, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8265, JAPAN