[tei-council] concerns regarding <charDesc>

[Lou Burnard]

Christian Wittern wrote:
> Lou Burnard wrote:
>   
>> Christian Wittern wrote:
>>   
>>     
>>> Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
>>>   
>>>     
>>>       
>>>> may be more consistent to name it <charDecl>, in line with <classDecl>?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>   
>>>>     
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>> Yep. That might solve Lou's problem with naming it <listChar>. So I'll
>>> go with this if there is no strong opinion against it.
>>>
>>>   
>>>     
>>>       
>> But you wouldn't like renaming <char> and <glyph> to <charDesc> and
>> <glyphDesc>?
>>
>>
>>
>>   
>>     
> Yes, I'd like to keep these two as they are. They are quite handy like
> that and I would specifically not like to re-use the now abolished
> <charDesc>, since this would cause confusion to current users, me thinks.
>
> Christian
>
>   
OK, tis done. And I am going to bed.

Good night!