[tei-council] <dimensions> reduex

[Arianna Ciula]

Lou Burnard wrote:

> Assuming that we don't do (a), my recommendations are
> 
> c, c-2, f

I agreed with this, but it is probably irrelevant now since things have 
been tidied up by Syd (same for <postscript>).

Arianna
> 
> 
> Syd Bauman wrote:
>> LB> Really, I think the best solution is to bring back <dimensions>!
>> SB> [Maybe not best, but a good idea.]
>> SR> yes. it would seem much more honest to have <dimensions> as a
>> SR> container for text.
>> CW> Then let the MS people have their dimensions. Seems like a good
>> CW> compromise.
>>
>> OK, as I'm still waiting for votes for or agin <ps> (about which I
>> see Lou just posted) or more discussion on facsimile markup, I'll get
>> going on this presently.
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> tei-council mailing list
> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

-- 
Dr Arianna Ciula
Research Associate
Centre for Computing in the Humanities
King's College London
Strand
London WC2R 2LS (UK)
Tel: +44 (0)20 78481945
http://www.kcl.ac.uk/cch