[tei-council] SV: Witness proposal
Matthew James Driscoll
mjd at hum.ku.dk
Thu Mar 22 05:16:06 EST 2007
In terms of revamping <witness>, which was never a terribly sophisticated
element, this proposal makes perfect sense. It is not clear to me, however,
whether the newly redefined <witness> element is intended as an alternative
to <msDescription> or whether there are situations in which one would use
both. Neither appeals much to me, I must say, especially as I can't see that
what is being proposed can't be done with <msDescription> as it is. The
original idea behind <msDescription>, in any case, was very much that it
should be able to be used for more than just cataloguing (our insistence on
this was what led to the bulk of the disagreements with "TEI-MMSS"), and it
was indeed my understanding that <witList> and <witness> were now to be
deprecated as redundant. If there are things which Gautier, representing
German, Italian and French practice, genuinely can't do using the current
<msDescription> mechanism it would be far more useful, it seems to me, for
us to try and adapt the existing mechanism, rather than coming up with a
parallel one.
Looking at his proposal, the chief lack seems to be a means of indicating
the sigla, for which he proposes a new <sigil> element; these can easily
appear within <msIdentifier> as <altIdentifier>, which takes a type
attribute. Otherwise the elements are largely from the <msDescription>
module, suggesting that perhaps we aren't so far off the mark after all.
Matthew
-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: Lou Burnard [mailto:lou.burnard at computing-services.oxford.ac.uk]
Sendt: 22 March 2007 00:22
Til: Matthew James Driscoll; TEI Council; gotpoupeau at infonie.fr
Emne: Witness proposal
In early november last year, Gautier Poupeau whom several of you will
recall from his presentation at the Members meeting, sent me a document
outlining a proposal to address the inconsistency currently subsisting
in the Guidelines about how manuscript (or print) witnesses should be
documented. I owe him, and the Council, a major apology for having not
done anything with it -- it simply got mislaid and then forgotten.
Fortunately, he's a persevering kind of chap, and I have now recovered
the draft and placed it somewhere you can see it, viz:
http://www.tei-c.org/Drafts/witnessPart/proposal-witness.xml
It's in French, so I will summarize briefly the proposal here (I will
also translate the document fully if so requested)
* create a new class called model.witnessPart. which is a subclass of
model.phrasel; use this class in the content model of <witness>
* add to this class a number of elements currently specific to
msDescription, specifically:
origDate, material, physDesc, seal, dimensions,
filiation,msIdentifier, msContents, rubric;
* re-introduce the "sigil" attribute as a new <sigil> element
* add a "class" attribute to <witness>
The suggestion is based on Gautier's extensive experience in adapting
TEI to the description of cartularies and similar documents, with due
regard to practice in German, Italian, and French collections.
I think the work is sufficiently straightforward to do quite quickly
(i.e. it can be done for P5); I also suspect that it would be a very
smart political move to be seen to be doing something in this area.
Initial comments?
(It occurs to me also that this might be something the newly revived mss
SIG would like to kick around -- but that could happen independently of
plumbing his suggestion into P5)
More information about the tei-council
mailing list