[Fwd: Re: [tei-council] on conformance document (was "Re: New discussion document on 1.0 release priorities")]

[Sebastian Rahtz]

Lou Burnard wrote:
>
> I think this is a misreading of the meaning of the word "level" here:
> it's not meant to be evaluative in the way you suggest. This is always a
> problem with this word, mind you: we need another one! any suggestions?
>
easy. just talk about "Conformance types", if you like.

but if you don't use levels, you have to find good words
to describe the types, which tends to end up being
an ordered list anyway.

-- 
Sebastian Rahtz      

Information Manager, Oxford University Computing Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431

OSS Watch: JISC Open Source Advisory Service
http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk