[tei-council] adding (non-)Struct elements to <date> & <time>

Christian Wittern wittern at kanji.zinbun.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Fri May 26 20:29:14 EDT 2006


Syd Bauman <Syd_Bauman at Brown.edu> writes:

> More questions/problems around this issue.
>
> (David B. and Matthew D., weren't you two supposed to be doing ND?
> You or whomever it was owes me a drink -- Lemon&aacute;de in Paris
> will do nicely, thank you -- as I'm doing your class work for you
> :-)

Thanks, Syd -- the important thing is that it gets done.  

>
> Should we add <date> and <time> to att.datePart, which declares
> * value=,
> * type=, and
> * full=,
> in order to mimic what <dateStruct> and <timeStruct> had? I'm
> inclined to say "yes", but I'd prefer some consensus before actually
> doing it.

I don't quite see the utility of @full, but I assume it has been
defined for some purpose, so "yes".

Could you add a note of what you did to the tcw07 document?  That
would allow as to track these changes in one place.

best, chw

-- 

 Christian Wittern 
 Institute for Research in Humanities, Kyoto University
 47 Higashiogura-cho, Kitashirakawa, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8265, JAPAN



More information about the tei-council mailing list