[tei-council] draft agenda for kyoto meeting

[Christian Wittern]

Sebastian Rahtz <Sebastian.Rahtz at oucs.ox.ac.uk> writes:

> Syd's topics are both very interesting. However, I think we should
> take a meta step first of making a catalogue of all the known issues
> between "now" and  "P5 being declared fully usable if not finished";
> as I think is implied by an agenda item CW put in. And then rank those,
> resource them, and work through them. Kind of like er um project
> planning.....

Thanks for supporting me on this.  Project planning seems to be a red
herring in some quarters and I clearly see and feel its limitations,
nevertheless... We need to deliver and we need to know where we are
lacking now.

> I would not like us to  suddenly dive into the interesting topic
> of <name> and spend half a day on it, without a clear sense of where
> it is in the roadmap.
>
> I am preparing a short paper listing some work I believe would
> be candidates for funding, which will be part of my contribution
> to the roadmap.

Thanks for this, I am looking forward to it. I would also appreciate
an update or maybe at a comment on how
http://www.tei-c.org/Drafts/edw81.xml?style=printable compares to the
current state. (It looks like it has last been updated on 2005-03-29).

All the best,

Christian

-- 
 Christian Wittern 
 Institute for Research in Humanities, Kyoto University
 47 Higashiogura-cho, Kitashirakawa, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8265, JAPAN