Personography discussion (was: Re: [tei-council] datatypes again: make data.key a URI)

[Laurent Romary]

Hi,
Am I being stupid or is it just the purpose of the W3C xml:base  
attribute? We could integrate it into P5, couldn't we?
Best,
Laurent

Le 9 nov. 05 à 02:34, Christian Wittern a écrit :

> Syd Bauman <Syd_Bauman at Brown.edu> writes:
>
>
>>> <name key="people.xml#foo">, remember
>>>
>>
>> Even this case could be handled by parsing on "#" and using
>> document() and id(), I think. But I want to be able to validate at
>> least
>>   <name key="http://my.names.org/namesFile.xml#foo">
>> if not
>>   <name key="http://my.names.org/namesFile.xml?query=foo">
>> and all sorts of other URIs as well.
>>
>
> And this is were I think it really gets silly.  Who wants to have to
> put full-blown URIs at every name occurrence?  It seems to me, we
> should at least have a mechanism to put everything except the query
> string somewhere in the header and let @key just provide the query
> string or #anchor.  Such a mechanism would also be useful for other
> cases, for example in @ref at <g>.
>
> For what its worth, I think now that we should defer a decision on
> this to the general personography discussion.  On that topic, Lou
> agreed to provide a draft working paper that could serve as a base for
> the discussion at a face-to-face meeting by the end of the year.  Are
> there other suggestions on how to proceed on this item?
>
> All the best,
>
> Christian
>
> -- 
>  Christian Wittern
>  Institute for Research in Humanities, Kyoto University
>  47 Higashiogura-cho, Kitashirakawa, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8265, JAPAN
> _______________________________________________
> tei-council mailing list
> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
>
>