Syd_Bauman at Brown.edu
Tue Oct 4 15:08:31 EDT 2005
LB> I have just noticed that using tei.data.blah as the name for the
LB> datatype "blah", as recommended in edw90, gives a tiny opporunity
LB> for confusion if we keep the convention that "tei.blah" is the
LB> name for the *class* "blah".... especially as we have a class
LB> called "data"!
SR> so call them macro.data.blah
SB> Either is fine with me.
SR> we could resolve this next week in the class meeting. ...
Errr... we didn't. Given the new naming conventions we did hammer out,
though, do we still need to worry about this? "tei.blah" is slated to
become "tei.model.blah" or perhaps "tei.att.blah", so we've no
More information about the tei-council