[tei-council] Datatypes.... continued

[Christian Wittern]

Lou Burnard <lou.burnard at computing-services.oxford.ac.uk> writes:

> I haven't heard any squawks of protest, so assuming people are
> reasonably happy with the datatypes so far proposed, I've now checked
> through the list in Syd's table for discrepancies, or things I've
> overlooked. The executive summary is that I think we need just one new
> datatype "tei.data.count", which I will add to the list. Otherwise,
> we're ready to move to implementation, assuming none of the following
> tidyup is controversial.


I have been terribly busy the last two weeks and did not find the time
necessary to dig into the datatypes arcanea, but I see you sorted it
out more or less now and it looks pretty fine to me at the moment.

All the best,

Christian


-- 

 Christian Wittern 
 Institute for Research in Humanities, Kyoto University
 47 Higashiogura-cho, Kitashirakawa, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8265, JAPAN