[tei-council] directory layout again

Lou Burnard lou.burnard at computing-services.oxford.ac.uk
Wed Jul 6 16:55:51 EDT 2005


Sebastian Rahtz wrote:

>So, on a Linux system, you
>might see
>
>  /usr/share/xml/teiclassic
>  /usr/share/xml/tei
>  /usr/share/xml/docbook
>  /usr/share/xml/xhtml
>
>so there would be no "p4" or "p5" layers anywhere, you would just choose
>a tree at the top level to work with. It simplifies lots of things, and
>makes it
>easier to document. I cannot think of a situation where we mingle P4 and P5.
>
>What do folks think? I know the big problem is that only one thing can
>be called "tei",
>so either P4 or P5 gets a new name. I believe that P5 should get the
>"tei" name, since
>it is where we are working, and we have started on our 0.1 release.
>
>  
>

Just for the record, I think this is a brilliant idea.





More information about the tei-council mailing list