[tei-council] some reports in
pwillett at umich.edu
Wed Jul 6 15:33:04 EDT 2005
Hmm, well, as I say, I haven't encountered them (to my relief). I guess if
on the witness stand and forced to answer, I would say I wouldn't use
numbered lgs. ("Aha!" exclaims opposing counsel triumphantly.) Still, I
stick to wanting numbered divs.
Perry (haunted by the hobgoblins of his inconsistency).
From: tei-council-bounces at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
[mailto:tei-council-bounces at lists.village.Virginia.EDU] On Behalf Of Julia
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 3:00 PM
To: tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
Subject: RE: [tei-council] some reports in
Does this mean that if you did need to nest <lg>s you would want to
have numbered ones available? I am aware of quite a number of
projects that do nest <lg> fairly extensively (none of which use
At 8:32 AM -0400 7/5/05, Perry Willett wrote:
>I've never encountered a need to nest <lg>s.
>From: Sebastian Rahtz
>[mailto:sebastian.rahtz at computing-services.oxford.ac.uk]
>Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 8:22 AM
>To: Perry Willett
>Cc: 'TEI Council'
>Subject: Re: [tei-council] some reports in
>Perry Willett wrote:
>>I also agree with the proposal to eliminate numbered lgs, but I don't
>>ever agreeing to give up numbered divs. I would argue strongly in favor of
>why are numbered divs ok but numbered lgs not?
>I too don't recall the subject being discussed formally.
>tei-council mailing list
>tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
tei-council mailing list
tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
More information about the tei-council