[tei-council] some reports in

[Laurent Romary]

I would strongly suggest to decouple the two arguments (i.e. numbered 
lgs vs. numbered divs). There are quite a few projects (comprising the 
TEI spec in ODD itself) that are using numbered divs as opposed to very 
few occurances of numbered lgs. As a consequence, I see it an easy 
decision to drop numbered lgs, but (even if I do not like numbered 
divs) would be more coutious in taking a similar decisions for 
divisions.
Laurent

Le 5 juil. 05, à 14:34, Syd Bauman a écrit :

>> I also agree with the proposal to eliminate numbered lgs, but I
>> don't recall ever agreeing to give up numbered divs. I would argue
>> strongly in favor of keeping them.
>
> I believe (although I could be mistaken) that Julia meant that the
> argument for dropping numbered <lg>s is parrallel to the argument for
> dropping numbered <div>s, and thus need not be repeated in her paper.
> (Rather than that we have already decided to drop numbered <div>s,
> which to my knowledge we have discussed briefly but never even
> seriously considered, let alone decided).
>
> She should be back from her trip sometime on Wed, so if I'm wrong
> she'll hopefully be able to correct me before the conference call.
>
> _______________________________________________
> tei-council mailing list
> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
>