[tei-council] another agenda item

[Lou Burnard]

Christian Wittern wrote:

>
>To provide a snapshot every couple of (days|weeks) to make it easier
>to follow development.
>The downside of this is that in most cases it is too frequent for most
>people to follow.  
>  
>

I agree. A nightly build is too frequent, particularly if we continue 
with the current spasmodic rate of progress.

>>In any case, the logic behind my suggestion was that although the
>>content of the snapshot releases might be mixed in nature, we'd only
>>make snaphots of "working" versions of the Guidelines, specifically
>>to avoid poor-quality snapshots. The idea being that CVS followers
>>take their chances, but snapshot downloaders should get the newest we
>>can provide that we know is at least rudimentarily OK.
>>    
>>
>
>That implies that we will need to have some kind of QA process before
>the snapshot release, not just packaging.
>  
>

What would we need beyond the current "make; make validate; make test" 
cycle?


>  
>