[tei-council] Agenda for conference call of the TEI Council on 2005-03-29 at 1300 UTC

[Julia Flanders]

Lou, looking at the discusson on SourceForge and at your summary in 
edw86, could I ask for a bit of clarification? edw86 proposes that 
text attributes be treated as a child of their original parent 
element, and that

"The content models for elements bearing such attributes should be 
expanded to include <rng:zeroOrMore><rng:ref 
name="tei.remarks"/></rng:zeroOrMore>. The proposed tei.remarks class 
has the following members: <agent> <desc>, <cause>, <label> (and 
<label2> if we really need it which I doubt), <reason> (if different 
from <cause> which I doubt), <reg> and probably some others yet to be 
determined."

However, on SourceForge your initial proposal centered on elements 
from macro.glossSeq (altIdent?, equiv*, gloss?, desc?). Which one 
represents the proposal we should be considering?

Julia

At 11:48 AM +0100 3/28/05, Lou Burnard wrote:
>Could we also add a review of edw86 to the agenda? This is the 
>document I circulated to this list on 5 March about the 
>"rationalization of attributes" : see my note of 5 March with the 
>subject "P5 Progress Report"