[tei-council] url vs xlink:href
James Cummings
James.Cummings at computing-services.oxford.ac.uk
Mon Feb 14 10:37:09 EST 2005
Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
> surely @url and @target are the same thing? as it stands in P5, we only
> have @target
Ah ok, it probably hasn't been updated in the draft I have (from your
debian packages), hence my confusion.
> its probably <graphic> which is out of sync, and should be xlink:xref
Ah, ok.
> that whole business of SVG inside <graphic>/<figure> seems to me merely
> illustrative and not TEI normative in any sense
That is what I thought, but wanted to be sure.
> maybe. it would conform with the depressing state of using xml:id,
> xml:lang and xml:base, and make
> my life even more difficult by making practically every TEI document use
> _3_ namespaces
True. XLink doesn't seemed to have ever had the popular support in
implementation as the other recommendations. Is this a reason to avoid it?
-James
--
Dr James Cummings, Oxford Text Archive, University of Oxford
James dot Cummings at oucs dot ox dot ac dot uk
More information about the tei-council
mailing list