[tei-council] Draft reply to John Smith

[Susan Schreibman]

it sounds like a very fair summary  Christian

susan

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Christian Wittern" <wittern at kanji.zinbun.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
To: "Christian Wittern" <wittern at kanji.zinbun.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
Cc: <tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU>
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 4:50 PM
Subject: Re: [tei-council] Draft reply to John Smith


> 
> Dear Council members,
> 
> several days have passed without a comment on this draft, so I assume
> it is endorsed and will send it to John as is.
> 
> All the best,
> 
> Christian
> 
> Christian Wittern <wittern at kanji.zinbun.kyoto-u.ac.jp> writes:
> 
> > Dear Council members,
> >
> > As promised, here is the draft of my reply to John Smith and the
> > Sanskrit taskforce.  Any comments welcome.
> >
> > ============================================================
> > Dear John,
> >
> > At its recent telephone conference, the TEI Council discussed the
> > proposal you submitted on behalf of the Sanskrit taskforce and I would
> > like to inform you now of the results.
> >
> > The TEI Council welcomed the submission and would like to thank you
> > and your collaborators for your work at enhancing the TEI
> > applicability to Sanskrit and other languages that require complex
> > analytical encoding.  
> >
> > The TEI Council agreed that the proposed form could be used to encode
> > this forms for data interchange and that it should be used in the next
> > version of the Guidelines to illustrate the use the intended
> > linguistic analysis, as well as the use of <seg> within <choice>.  
> >
> > The ensuing discussion centered around how the constraints on the use
> > of attribute values, that are implicit or in the text of your proposal
> > could be formalized using a schema language.  Several possibilities
> > were proposed, but none of them could be immediately agreed on.  As it
> > turned out, validation in a very rigid form for a case like this will
> > require the TEI to review the procedures within the overall framework
> > of the TEI.  
> >
> > The last issue, which basically means that no immediate, automatic
> > validation through a xml parser is available, should be a minor
> > concern to your group, I think, since the software you are developping
> > will act as some kind of special-purpose-validator, as its function
> > will depend on the correct application of the markup.  If that does
> > not sound feasible, a Schematron rule could be used to validate the
> > markup.
> >
> > While the validation procedure is still pending, the TEI Council
> > thinks the markup as suggested is useful and appropriate and would
> > like to encourage you to implement it as it stands.
> >
> >
> > All the best,
> >
> > Christian Wittern 
> >
> > Chair, TEI Technical Council
> >
> >
> > ============================================================
> >
> >
> > -- 
> >
> >  Christian Wittern 
> >  Institute for Research in Humanities, Kyoto University
> >  47 Higashiogura-cho, Kitashirakawa, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8265, JAPAN
> > _______________________________________________
> > tei-council mailing list
> > tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
> > http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
> 
> -- 
> 
>  Christian Wittern 
>  Institute for Research in Humanities, Kyoto University
>  47 Higashiogura-cho, Kitashirakawa, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8265, JAPAN
> _______________________________________________
> tei-council mailing list
> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
> 
>