[tei-council] xml-colon-thing
Christian Wittern
wittern at kanji.zinbun.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Thu Nov 11 19:51:16 EST 2004
Lou Burnard <lou.burnard at computing-services.oxford.ac.uk> writes:
> The Character set workgroup has proposed and the Council has (I think)
> accepted that the global lang attribute should be replaced by a global
> xml:lang attribute; likewise the Standoff WG has proposed and the
> Council is (I think) still ruminating about the notion that the global
> "id" attribute should be replaced by a global xml:id attribute.
>
> Pondering how to actually implement these proposals in P5 without
> causing too much havoc, I have reached the conclusion that it would be
> both feasible and advisable to make the transition in a rather more
> cautious way. I am proposing to add xml:lang as an *alternative* to lang
> in the definition for tei.global.attributes rather than as a
> replacement for it.
I think we should do what we can to make the transition to P5 easier,
on the other hand, I do not see much to be gained in making a half-way
transition possible, let alone recommending it. The value TEI
requires for lang has to follow ISO 639 and RFC 3066 (might be wrong
with the number..) and xml:lang does so similarily, except that it
point to newer versions that are themselves backward compatible. In
most cases, there will be no change necessary. So I do not really see
what is to be gained by allowing lang. The case is of course
different with xml:id, and the whole ID/IDREF stuff -- as I understand
the current situation, there will be an option to retain ID/IDREF
processing in schemata that have this notion, no?
All the best,
Christian
--
Christian Wittern
Institute for Research in Humanities, Kyoto University
47 Higashiogura-cho, Kitashirakawa, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8265, JAPAN
More information about the tei-council
mailing list