Endorsement of edw54

[Lou Burnard]

See my earlier note in response to Christian. If there are other things
in the current state of edw54 which need change, I'd appreciate a memory
jog as to what they are -- and apologise in advance for having missed 
them.

L

<p>On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 18:14, Merrilee_Proffitt at notes.rlg.org wrote:
> 
> I agree with Christian, and would like to see an updated version that
> addresses the proposed revisions.  So for the time being, I vote B.
> 
> I'll forward my comments on again, if I need to.  Just say the word, Lou.
> 
> Merrilee
> 
> 
> 
>                                                                                                                                        
>                     Christian Wittern                                                                                                  
>                     <wittern at kanji.zinbun.kyoto-u.ac.j       To:     tei-council at lists.village.virginia.edu                            
>                     p>                                       cc:                                                                       
>                     Sent by:                                 Subject:     Re: Endorsement of edw54                                     
>                     owner-tei-council at lists.village.vi                                                                                 
>                     rginia.edu                                                                                                         
>                                                                                                                                        
>                                                                                                                                        
>                     02/02/2003 05:16 PM                                                                                                
>                     Please respond to tei-council                                                                                      
>                                                                                                                                        
>                                                                                                                                        
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Burnard Towers <lou.burnard at computing-services.oxford.ac.uk> writes:
> 
> > The minutes of the council meeting in London last year (TCM01) include an
> > action on council members to review document EDW54, the one which defines
> > Workgroup procedures in general, so that it can be "enacted" as TEI
> policy.
> > The minutes of the next council meeting (TCM02) show no discussion of
> this
> > action, nor does it seem to have been mentioned subsequently. As this is
> > rather an important part of the way the TEI technical work is defined and
> > carried out, I would like to place this once more on the agenda. Could
> all
> > council members PLEASE review this document and VOTE on one of the
> following
> > propositions:
> >
> > A: "EDW54 is endorsed by the TEI Council as defining approved procedures
> for
> > all TEI Workgroups"
> > B: "EDW54 is in need of modification before it can be adopted by the
> Council
> > as defining approved procedures for all TEI Workgroups"
> > (If you vote B, you probably also need to make some suggestion about the
> > kinds of modification you think necessary)
> 
> In light of Lou's  other post "Naming of Things", I do not see where
> EDW54 says that WG heads are "ex officio" Council members.  This has
> not been stated before (I think) and if that is the fact, I feel it
> should be mentioned in EDW54.  I vote "B" therefore.
> 
> All the best,
> 
> Christian
> 
> 
> --
> 
>  Christian Wittern
>  Institute for Research in Humanities, Kyoto University
>  47 Higashiogura-cho, Kitashirakawa, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8265, JAPAN
> 
> 
> 
> 
>