Council meeting, January 12, 2002

[Merrilee Proffitt]

I think there is a big difference between circulating a summary via email 
and posting a detailed (but unapproved) summary on a web site where it 
becomes an official TEI document.  Possibly, you could route an email to 
the members simply that the meeting occurred; saying who attended the 
meeting; giving the major topics covered (but not outcomes); and when the 
meeting minutes will be available.  Hopefully this would allow us to appear 
responsive and demonstrate that progress is being made, without sacrificing 
accuracy.

[Merrilee]

 > > If we are correcting things for the record, under the Estate section, I
> > would add [...snip]

[Lou responds]

>I'm sure the Minutes when they appear will address this.

Well, that's what I am getting at!  There are small errors that give the 
wrong impression, and yet this document will be given the same treatment as 
the actual minutes.  Who will go back and read the minutes after this has 
been posted?

I'd like to hear what others think.

Merrilee