Re: On Eternal Recurrence

RTieger111@aol.com
Mon, 11 Aug 1997 09:17:16 -0400 (EDT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: RTieger111@aol.com: "Re: You asked for it!"
Previous message: Paul Shane: "Re: Beating up on old dogs"
Maybe in reply to: Hulki Forta: "On Eternal Recurrence"
Next in thread: Litok384@aol.com: "Re: On Eternal Recurrence"

But you seem to forget that time is not exactly linear with an ER, ad time is
based on motion, so when the universe collapses, time runs "backwards", and
expansions are forward. Based on bang/crunch theory, this neccesates an ER.
Rich

--- from list nietzsche@lists.village.virginia.edu ---

Next message: RTieger111@aol.com: "Re: You asked for it!"
Previous message: Paul Shane: "Re: Beating up on old dogs"
Maybe in reply to: Hulki Forta: "On Eternal Recurrence"
Next in thread: Litok384@aol.com: "Re: On Eternal Recurrence"