> Thanks there John Hartmann, but I didnt come on the discussion
>group to go off reading... I can do that anytime. And anywhere so I return
>to the questions. That is what counts. And to assume they have been
>'answered" is not very ubermenschy. Tata for now. And I know Klos. very
>well., yet my questions remain Bu thanks anyhow and when I have a chance
>I'll take a look at yer essai.
answers. You are obviously not willing to look very far, however. Not
writing a paper, by any chance?
That, by the way, is a running joke on the list. Whenever anyone shows up
with a laundry list of questions, and then goes into a huff because none of
them have been answered, the stock response almost always is: "Not writing a
paper, by any chance?" Or something like that.
Another running joke: Whenever anyone posts a "What is the Eternal Return?"
question, the stock response tends to be: "Oh no, not that thing again!" Or
some such response, accompanied by various grunts, moans, and bodily noises.
Of course, it just happens that, more often than not, posters of "What is
the Eternal Return?" questions just happen to be writing papers...
Tom Fool
>
> CD>
>
>On Tue, 5 Aug 1997, I REALIZED JOLLY FAT MEN CAN'T BE PICKY. -- CORY
MCCONNELL wrote:
>
>> Hi CD...
>>
>> To answer a few of the questions you raised in the Nietzsche group,
>> please take a look at my paper entitled "Nietzsche and Metaphor"
>> at http://www.geocities.com/Athens/1575... just follow the
>> link to "Philosophy is like a box of chocolates..." and the paper is
>> available at the bottom of the page. It deals with ER, N and metaphoricity,
>> and includes work from Deleuze, Klossowski, and many others.
>>
>> John Hartmann
>>
>
>
>
> --- from list nietzsche@lists.village.virginia.edu ---
>
>
>
--- from list nietzsche@lists.village.virginia.edu ---