Re: ER as weltanschauung/Truth and Poetry

Dax Ross (dax@ramedia.com)
Sat, 14 Jun 1997 14:29:14 -0700

Erik Hoogcarspel wrote:
>
> in fact the dispute is much older. heidegger, as a faithful follower of plato
> takes being as transcendental fullness, while nietzsche follows aristotle for
> whom being was no more than a logical function
>
> -regards, erik

Erik,

I thought that Heidegger does not offer a definition of being
(transcendence or any other) and that Heidegger criticizes N
for attempting to circumscribe Being with what Heidegger takes
to be N's metaphysics: Will to Power in the mode of Eternal
Return.

I am actually new to Heidegger and would welcome any other
discussion regarding Heidegger vis a vis Nietzsche.

-- 
Dax Ross
RA Media
dax@ramedia.com
http://dax.ramedia.com




	--- from list nietzsche@jefferson.village.virginia.edu ---