[sixties-l] Demanding Justice for Peltier

From: radman (resist@best.com)
Date: Wed Jul 18 2001 - 03:34:02 EDT

  • Next message: Sharon Smith: "[sixties-l] The 60s and growth of Buddhism in the West"

    June/July 2001

    Demanding Justice for Peltier


    FBI admissions underscore the need for a new hearing


    Before leaving office, President Bill Clinton pardoned Marcus Rich and
    other rich people who gave money to his elitist post-presidency plans. Now,
    we need a massive new campaign to free Leonard Peltier. We must make action
    by the Parole Commission unavoidable. And no matter what private views
    President George W. Bush holds, he must understand that the only way he can
    answer is to issue a pardon.
    A habeas corpus petition has been filed in Federal District Court in
    Topeka, KS. Peltier is serving time nearby in Leavenworth. The petition
    challenges the actions of the US Parole Commission; specifically its
    illegal, erroneous, arbitrary, capricious, and unconstitutional denial of
    parole. It also questions the decision to schedule Peltier's next parole
    hearing for December 2008. That's 12 years in excess of the commission's
    applicable guidelines, and six years after the date set by Congress for the
    abolition of the commission itself. If and when a hearing is held, we need
    to fill the courtroom.
    Peltier's petition also charges that, as a result of changes in federal
    parole laws, practices, and procedures since 1975, Peltier has been
    imprisoned longer than the law then authorized. This violates the US
    Constitution's ex post facto clause, as well as Peltier's right to due
    process and equal protection.
          Recapping the Case
    For those unfamiliar with the facts, Peltier has been in prison for more
    than 25 years for a crime he didn't commit. In response to a Freedom of
    Information Action-based lawsuit, the FBI has admitted that agents
    provided false testimony during his trial. The prosecutors have testified
    that they have no idea who actually committed the crime.
    Even before his arrest and extradition from Canada, Myrtle Poor Bear was
    tortured and terrorized by the FBI into saying that she was Peltier's
    girlfriend and had witnessed his shooting of FBI agents. Actually, she
    didn't know him, and admitted prior to the trial that the FBI had coerced
    her statement.
    Years ago, the Canadian government said that it wouldn't have extradited
    Peltier without the dishonest testimony provided by the US. Later, the US
    admitted what it had done. Yet, when Myrtle Poor Bear showed up at the
    trial to tell the truth, her testimony was banned.
    His trial took place in a different state than the ones for two of his
    co-defendants. They were acquitted, while an all-White jury found Peltier
    guilty. In addition, he wasn't allowed to claim self-defense. From several
    hundred yards away, he had fired back at over 150 FBI agents, BIA police,
    SWAT team, and local posse members who had already shot at men, women, and
    There is also evidence that someone else killed the two agents, who had
    entered the reservation on a false pretext.
    Why was Peltier on the reservation? The FBI had worked with local
    conservative Lakotas to sell part of the reservation to a corporation that
    wanted to mine uranium deposits. After FBI-infiltrated goon squads killed
    more than 70 Lakotas who actively resisted the sale, Peltier was invited to
    set up an American Indian Movement (AIM) group to protect local residents.
    Peltier was a Chippewa Lakota Pipe carrier and AIM activist.
    In fact, that's why the two FBI agents entered the reservation, providing a
    pretext for others to follow and fire. Besides the two agents, Joe Stuntz,
    a native Lakota, also died. But neither the FBI nor any other part of the
    government ever investigated his killing.
          Questions of Fairness
    Dealing with diabetes, high blood pressure, and a serious heart condition,
    Peltier has already suffered a stroke. His phone privileges have been
    serious curtailed. In addition, he should be able to visit with his
    children and grandchildren outside the limitations and confines of prison.
    Members of the Peltier Defense Committee, located in Lawrence, KS, visit
    with him at least once a week. They report that his sense of humor hasn't
    been lost, his spirits remain remarkably strong, and he's still painting.
    Recently, he told them that he was happy to receive a letter I sent. Among
    other things, I said that my wife, Elizabeth Peterson, and I have one of
    his paintings on our wall. But I've always been denied the right to visit him.
    When Peltier's conviction was appealed, the appellate judges decided that
    ballistic evidence had been improperly withheld, and that, had the jury
    known about it, he might have been acquitted. Shockingly, the appeal was
    nevertheless denied on a technicality.
    But as Federal Appeals Court Judge Heaney later wrote: "The United States
    government must share the responsibility with the Native Americans for the
    June 26 firefight ... . [T]he FBI used improper tactics in securing
    Peltier's extradition from Canada and in otherwise trying the Peltier case
    ... . [A]t some point a hearing process must begin."
    We as a nation must treat Native Americans more fairly. To do so, we must
    recognize their unique culture and their great contributions to our nation.
    Favorable action by the president in the Leonard Peltier case would be an
    important step in this regard.
          Next Steps
    The Defense Committee doesn't plan to march outside the prison in June,
    since the last time they did so Peltier was put in the Hole. Instead,
    they'll restructure and issue a new call for local community events soon.
    After more organizing and actions, they'll announce a national event,
    probably in December.

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Jul 18 2001 - 15:49:12 EDT