Re: Group III critique

Eva Nicole Siegel (ens2k@uva.pcmail.virginia.edu)
Fri, 19 Apr 96 11:58:20 EDT

Wow,

The dream project is wonderful. The backgrounds are alanagous to the moods
presented throughout the project, and also to the moods one feels when
dreaming (or at least I feel when dreaming). Interspercing quotes along with
the dreams was nice too...gave it a grounding feeling--not too dreamy. The
dreams themselves were short enough to keep my attention, and bizarre enough
to fulfill my voyeristic tendencies. Such a great idea, and you have all
pulled it off wonderfully. I also felt like the conscious page was a great
starting point, and there was so much information beneath it all (which,
incedently is a great way to have the project represent the subconsious on
the whole). I'm sure that I didn't make all of the links, but I'd think I
was done and then I'd discover more wonderful dreams.

I wonder, do you analyze your dreams at all, or are you planning on doing
that? It would be interesting to see what the decapitated father dream
meant, again, from a stricktly voyeristic point of view. The images were
also great. I didn't feel like they were superflous, like in so many other
websites I have seen. They tied in nicely to the content of the nodes.

This is a pretty weak critique, considering the amount of time that I'm sure
went into the project, so I'll follow it up with more this weekend. This was
more of a quick critique to say that I really enjoyed the project, in its
entirety, and I look forward to "completing" it (i.e. linking to all of the
nodes) if such a thing is possible. My only question would be:
1. Will you be/have you already/is it appropriate to analyze the dreams?

Bennissimo!

Eva N. Juncker