20.566 scholarly works of art

From: Humanist Discussion Group (by way of Willard McCarty willard.mccarty_at_kcl.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 08:17:11 +0100

               Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 20, No. 566.
       Centre for Computing in the Humanities, King's College London
                     Submit to: humanist_at_princeton.edu

         Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 08:14:54 +0100
         From: Willard McCarty <willard.mccarty_at_kcl.ac.uk>
         Subject: scholarly works of art

From: Ken Friedman <ken.friedman_at_bi.no>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 14:50:53 +0200

Dear Willard,

This topic interests me greatly. Alas, I am under a heavy deadline so
I cannot really say much.

I will point to two major discussions on the theme. The first was the
UK Arts and Humanities Research Council Practice-Led Review. You'll
find the results of an extensive debate from last June and July archived at


The debate started on June 2 and ended on July 10.

This was also the topic in part of a debate titled "Picasso's PhD" on
the Design Research Society list at


The debate went on for about three months, starting at the beginning
of April 2000, leading up to a conference on doctoral education in
design at La Clusaz, France.

I appreciated your comments, and I tend to agree, as you'll see from
my summaries in the Practice-Led Review.



Prof. Ken Friedman
Institute for Communication, Culture, and Language
Norwegian School of Management
Center for Design Research
Denmark's Design School
+47    Tlf NSM
+47    Tlf Privat
email: ken.friedman_at_bi.no
Dr Willard McCarty | Reader in Humanities Computing | Centre for
Computing in the Humanities | King's College London |
Received on Wed Apr 11 2007 - 03:24:36 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Apr 11 2007 - 03:24:39 EDT