20.566 scholarly works of art

               Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 20, No. 566.
       Centre for Computing in the Humanities, King's College London
  www.kcl.ac.uk/schools/humanities/cch/research/publications/humanist.html
                        www.princeton.edu/humanist/
                     Submit to: humanist_at_princeton.edu

         Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 08:14:54 +0100
         From: Willard McCarty <willard.mccarty_at_kcl.ac.uk>
         Subject: scholarly works of art

From: Ken Friedman <ken.friedman_at_bi.no>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 14:50:53 +0200

Dear Willard,

This topic interests me greatly. Alas, I am under a heavy deadline so
I cannot really say much.

I will point to two major discussions on the theme. The first was the
UK Arts and Humanities Research Council Practice-Led Review. You'll
find the results of an extensive debate from last June and July archived at

http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/AHRC-WORKSHOP-PL.html

The debate started on June 2 and ended on July 10.

This was also the topic in part of a debate titled "Picasso's PhD" on
the Design Research Society list at

http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/DRS.html

The debate went on for about three months, starting at the beginning
of April 2000, leading up to a conference on doctoral education in
design at La Clusaz, France.

I appreciated your comments, and I tend to agree, as you'll see from
my summaries in the Practice-Led Review.

Yours,

Ken

--
Prof. Ken Friedman
Institute for Communication, Culture, and Language
Norwegian School of Management
Oslo
Center for Design Research
Denmark's Design School
Copenhagen
+47 46.41.06.76    Tlf NSM
+47 33.40.10.95    Tlf Privat
email: ken.friedman_at_bi.no
Dr Willard McCarty | Reader in Humanities Computing | Centre for
Computing in the Humanities | King's College London |
http://staff.cch.kcl.ac.uk/~wmccarty/.