20.472 MLA report on tenure and promotion

From: Humanist Discussion Group (by way of Willard McCarty willard.mccarty_at_kcl.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 06:47:29 +0000

               Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 20, No. 472.
       Centre for Computing in the Humanities, King's College London
  www.kcl.ac.uk/schools/humanities/cch/research/publications/humanist.html
                        www.princeton.edu/humanist/
                     Submit to: humanist_at_princeton.edu

         Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 06:39:39 +0000
         From: ian.lancashire_at_utoronto.ca
         Subject: MLA report on tenure and promotion

Dear Willard

In case I've missed this on Humanist, forgive me, but I just found out
about the MLA report on tenure and promotion (Dec. 7, 2006). The
figures on evaluating e-articles and e-monographs in doctoral
institutions are astounding. 40.8% have no experience in evaluating
e-articles, 65.7% have no experience in evalating e-monographs. MLA
recommends a "more capacious conception of scholarship" and urges
institutions to recognize the "legitimacy of scholarship produced in
new media."

See

http://www.mla.org/pdf/tenure_summary.pdf

Let's thank MLA.

Ian
Received on Wed Feb 28 2007 - 02:04:15 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Feb 28 2007 - 02:04:21 EST