15.138 Newcastle: after the wine

From: Humanist Discussion Group (willard@lists.village.Virginia.EDU)
Date: Sat Jul 21 2001 - 15:32:29 EDT

  • Next message: Humanist Discussion Group: "15.140 cast01; CLIN 2001; 2001 TOHE; Michael Ondaatje"

                  Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 15, No. 138.
          Centre for Computing in the Humanities, King's College London
                  <http://www.princeton.edu/~mccarty/humanist/>
                 <http://www.kcl.ac.uk/humanities/cch/humanist/>

            Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 15:21:39 -0500 (EST)
            From: Francois Lachance <lachance@chass.utoronto.ca>
            Subject: Newcastle -- after the wine

    Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 13:49:06 -0400 (EDT)
    From: Francois Lachance <lachance@chass.utoronto.ca>

    To the attendees of the symposium hosted by
    Centre for Literary and Linguistic Computing
    The University of Newcastle Australia
    on the theme of
    A Practicable Future for Computing in the Humanities

    Anyone care to venture a report on the session led by Allen Renear?

    I am intrigued by his contention that

    <cite>
    humanists don't deserve the illumination thay have gotten. For the most
    part they remain quite set in their familar ways -- deploying tired
    (however various) analytical strategies and rhetorical practices, that,
    when combined a faint-heartedness (or is it diffedence?) about engagement
    on unfamiliar ground ensures that promising wonderful new lines of
    research will be mostly fumbled rather than developed.
    </cite>

    I suspect the attendees were able to construct a knowledge representation
    that ontologically and operationally made a distinction between
    "humanitsts" and "computing humanists". Was a similar distinction made
    between "tired rhetoric" and appeals to novelty (the invocation of the
    good of the new being by now an old ploy)? All ironic quips aside, I am
    genuinely interested in learning about the tenor of this session since the
    individual psychologies of key players can be determining factors in the
    history of a group's knowledge practices, let alone how that history may
    affect the future objects and subjects of a sociology of knowledge.

    The abstracts are available in a proprietary format:
    http://www.newcastle.edu.au/department/lc/symposium/pdf/abstracts.pdf

    -- 
    Francois Lachance, Scholar-at-large
    	 http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~lachance
    20th : Machine Age :: 21st : Era of Reparation
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Jul 21 2001 - 16:16:25 EDT