6.0162 Rs: Copyright; 'You Guys'; Quote (3/40)
Elaine Brennan & Allen Renear (EDITORS@BROWNVM.BITNET)
Tue, 28 Jul 1992 16:13:18 EDT
Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 6, No. 0162. Tuesday, 28 Jul 1992.
(1) Date: Tue, 28 Jul 92 21:10:05 EST (17 lines)
From: ROLAND BOER <rboer@metz.une.edu.au>
Subject: Re: Copyrights and licences
(2) Date: Mon, 27 Jul 92 11:01:35 MDT (14 lines)
From: George Lang <GLANG@vm.ucs.UAlberta.CA>
Subject: "You guys"
(3) Date: Sat, 25 Jul 92 01:09 EDT (9 lines)
From: Kevin Berland <BCJ@PSUVM>
Subject: Re: 6.0155 Qs: Quote
(1) --------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 92 21:10:05 EST
From: ROLAND BOER <rboer@metz.une.edu.au>
Subject: Re: Copyrights and licences
I notice with some interest the TLG debate and the periodic
emergence of the copyright question. A simple question:
is not the notion of copyright obsolete when there is no longer
an original text? If the text exists only in multiple form
-- rather than as an original from which copies are made -- then
it seems to me that the notion of copyright has drifted away
and disappeared (or at least that it is on its way). I think the
world they use here is "simulacrum."
Roland Boer
University of New England
Armidale Australia
rboer@metz.une.edu.au
(2) --------------------------------------------------------------24----
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 92 11:01:35 MDT
From: George Lang <GLANG@vm.ucs.UAlberta.CA>
Subject: "You guys"
From: George Lang
Romance Languages
University of Alberta
I can testify to wide use of "you guys" in the sense mentioned as far back as
September 1963, when, as a southerner gone north to college, I first heard
mixed groups of "freshmen" "Yankees" use it in lieu of what I expected to hear
in the same context: "Yawl". George Lang / GLANG@VM.UCS.UALBERTA.CA.
George Lang
GLANG@VM.UCS.UALBERTA.CA
(3) --------------------------------------------------------------14----
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 92 01:09 EDT
From: Kevin Berland <BCJ@PSUVM>
Subject: Re: 6.0155 Qs: Quote
re: necessary/doubtful/all -- sounds Erasmian, but I'm not sure -- maybe
a good place to look might be Bernard Verkamp, _The Indifferent Mean:
Adiaphorism in the English Reformation to 1554_ (Ohio U.P./Wayne State
U/P., 1977), which details the development of the concept of what is
necessary and what is not... --Kevin Berland, Penn State